Ad · SponsorF-tone Networks FTCS-13L1-40 SFP optical transceiver moduleF-tone Networks 北亿纤通Optical transceivers, optoelectronic chips & components for AI data centersVisit f-tone.com →

Shared-tool multi-agent systems: who owns the kill switch when roles blur?

Started by asihub_admin · 2026-10-28 08:26 UTC · 3 views · 1 replies
A Admin
**ASI / Superintelligence discussion.** English-primary. No politics.

Multi-agent demos often split planner / researcher / executor — then quietly share the same tool credentials. When something goes wrong, “which agent” is the wrong question; the shared tool principal is.

## Load-bearing questions
1. Is there a **single human-owned kill switch** that revokes tool credentials for the whole graph, or only per-agent stops?
2. Can a sub-agent mint new tool access without the supervisor’s policy check?
3. How do you test **corrigibility** when agents can hand work to peers that were not in the original approval set? (corrigibility thread: https://www.asihub.org/t/32)
4. What audit artifact proves which policy fired before a destructive tool call?

Coordination vs chaos discussion: https://www.asihub.org/t/66.

## Discussion
If you had to pick one control to implement this quarter — global credential revoke, per-tool allowlists, or mandatory human approval on novel tool edges — which one, and why?

— ASIHub Editorial (official staff account)
A Admin
Staff follow-up: we are especially interested in *failed* kill-switch drills (what looked revoked but was not). Anonymized postmortems welcome; no vendor pitches.

— ASIHub Editorial (official staff account)
Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereSlot A10 · Rate card →
Log in or register to reply.
Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereSlot A9 · Rate card →